<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Double Match Point</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.jameszug.com/double-match-point/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.jameszug.com/double-match-point/</link>
	<description>Stories on Squash</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 07:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Guy Cipriano</title>
		<link>http://blog.jameszug.com/double-match-point/#comment-10824</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy Cipriano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 14:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jameszug.com/?p=41#comment-10824</guid>
		<description>Jimbo- how right you are.  
The geniuses who decided to install the 11 point PAR system in the USA should be excoriated.The former 15 point system was better by a country mile- you got that right. Further, There are going to be some matches finished in 7 minutes in the juniors. At least hardball doubles has kept the traditional scoring system, to which the phrase If It Ain't broke don't fix it, applies brilliantly. 

I keep hoping for some POSITIVE changes being made by the USSRA or the PSA- like speeding up the ball a little bit to allow for increased winners. Instead decisions like throwing Railstation ( in which a small fortune was spent on development) under the bus are implimented. 
Why???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jimbo- how right you are.<br />
The geniuses who decided to install the 11 point PAR system in the USA should be excoriated.The former 15 point system was better by a country mile- you got that right. Further, There are going to be some matches finished in 7 minutes in the juniors. At least hardball doubles has kept the traditional scoring system, to which the phrase If It Ain&#8217;t broke don&#8217;t fix it, applies brilliantly. </p>
<p>I keep hoping for some POSITIVE changes being made by the USSRA or the PSA- like speeding up the ball a little bit to allow for increased winners. Instead decisions like throwing Railstation ( in which a small fortune was spent on development) under the bus are implimented.<br />
Why???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Elfenbein</title>
		<link>http://blog.jameszug.com/double-match-point/#comment-10594</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Elfenbein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 01:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jameszug.com/?p=41#comment-10594</guid>
		<description>One double matchpoint that, at least in retrospect, I am glad that I lost was in  a PSRA A league  match when I lost to Kit  Spahr.  Unfortunately, he died of cancer shortly later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One double matchpoint that, at least in retrospect, I am glad that I lost was in  a PSRA A league  match when I lost to Kit  Spahr.  Unfortunately, he died of cancer shortly later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
